The Only "Secret" To Successful Handicapping and Betting

 

People talk about "secrets" - the secret to this, the secret to that.  You've heard or read them before, "Get the insider secrets to making a million dollars before tomorrow morning!" etc. etc.  It's an old come-on, the "learn the secret" soft con.

But - I have a question for you:  did you know there really is a secret to making money at the races?

Just one.

One thing only that you must know in order to have a huge advantage over 90% of all other race players.  

Have you ever heard the expression, "The best place to hide something is right under a person's nose?"

The secret I'm speaking of has always been there - right under every race player's nose!  It doesn't only belong to the "wise-guys," the "insiders," or the "sharpies."  In fact, many of them either don't know it, or refuse to use it.  They are forever looking for a special advantage in an individual race; whereas, the full-time, serious player is looking for an advantage that will apply more often, in a more general way.

Once you know this "secret" and put it to use, you will - once and for all - turn the odds overwhelmingly in your favor.  

When you discover the solution to the ages-old mystery of how to beat the races, you'll immediately be in a position of real power - the power to turn "gambling" into "controlled risk investing."

 

"Alright already" (I can hear you saying) "So what's the bloody secret!?"

Just this: Know when the favorite in a race is weak - and bet the other contenders in a way that maximizes profit.

That's it.  You just got the key to profits - the real "secret" of race betting success.  There are no immutable laws in racing - it's far too dynamic for that, but this is as close as it comes.

The remainder of this letter will give you some handicapping factors that you can use to find "false favorites."  

At the end of this letter, there will be a link to a new book and a free offer that will really help with the second half of the above equation - how to bet those races you've found where the favorite is weak.  

The new book by Dr. Robert Anthony “Wagering To Win” is a must-have for all gamblers of whatever ilk - as it deals with casino gambling as well as betting the horses. 

 If you really want to optimize your wagering for increased profits in these "false favorite" races, you'll definitely want to get this book.

 

 

Let's get into the factors that will point out weakness in an over-bet crowd favorite.  I'll group these factors under five headings:  

	The ability of the trainer
	The ability of the jockey
	The ability of the horse
	The current form of the horse
	Miscellaneous factors

 

Trainer ability: 

The obvious first "look" is to see if he or she has any ability!  

Trainers whose horses win at an over-all percentage of 7% or so (or less) are prime go-against candidates.  Winning across all odds at these low rates (assuming he has sent out at least 30 runners)  means a bettor would really need about 14 or 15-1 on these guy's horses in order to consider it a fair bet.  How poor a wager then if his horse is going favored!

Don't use any of these factors in isolation - any trainer can send out a horse capable of winning a given race, but let's set these trainers' runners aside as potential "false favorites."

Also - a trainer with more average looking over-all win figures - say 10-12% - can still be very weak in certain areas: turf races, 1st after a claim, 1st time starters, 1st after a lay-off, etc..  You should look further into the trainers records - past just his cumulative totals.

 

Jockey ability:  

I don't put as much emphasis here unless the jock is one of the so-called "no win" types at the circuit.  If his or her record is extremely poor - say 4-6% or less (over 50 races), then yes - I'll demote any horse ridden by that jock.

 

Horse ability: 

This category should, of course, get the most scrutiny.  The BIG question is always: Can this horse be expected to compete well enough to deserve favoritism in today's race?  

Very often the answer is "no" - from a resounding, "no way in hell" - to a not so sure "probably not."

What should you look for in order to place the horse somewhere in that range?

First - its par times / ability times / power or pace ratings / etc.

If you use a computer program to crunch raw data into some type of final rating - and you have chosen a good and representative race from which to enter the data (that is, you've avoided the "garbage in - garbage out" problem) then any favorite that rates poorly in those numbers should be considered as a potentially weak favorite.

When a horse has shown that it can't or won't run to the pars - or pace demands of today's race - how could it possibly be considered for favoritism?  

A response might be, "But what if they're all a bunch of nags and none of 'em can run?"  

Okay - then you have what's been termed a "chaos" race - hard to figure, hard to handicap and predict.  In that kind of race where every runner is weak, the favorite becomes a solid bet-against candidate if: 

          It is inconsistent at today's level (likely - if it can't run to par) 
          winning at a rate of  8 or 9% or less, or hasn't won in last 
          6 or 7 tries. 

          It has a trainer or jockey of the type we've noted above.

          It just won its last race while not favored (and not running to par) - 
          and didn't step up in class.

 

Current Form: 

A horse may have the potential ability or back class to be able to trounce today's field - IF - it is at the point in its condition cycle that will allow a top performance.  

Again - this is often not the case, yet maybe because it is a "high profile" horse with a top jock or trainer that has some sparkling performances in past races, it will go favored today regardless of its readiness.

 A lot has been written and discussed - and used and abused - when it comes to identifying and getting a handle on a horses' current form.  Formerly, any kind of layoff of over a month for cheap to mid-level claimers was looked at in a negative way.  

Racing has changed.

Horses can and are being given longer breaks away from racing - then coming back fresh and in condition to run well.  William Scott published a couple of handicapping books in the early 80's that put forth some pretty good guidelines that still hold (more-or-less) today. 

Here's a gross simplification of his extensive research . . .

A favorite (or any other horse) can be coming off a layoff - even one as long as 6 months - and still be legitimate if it has worked 5 furlongs within the last 14 days.  
                        - If that workout is fast relative to the others recorded 
                          that day - even better.
                        - If the horse has had a string of evenly spaced works 
                          of whatever distance leading up to (or following) the 5f 
                          work within 14 days - even better.

Remember - none of these factors should be used in isolation.  When looking at a favorite coming off a layoff, I'd also consider the trainer's record with layoffs.  Some like to bring their horses back a bit slower - racing them into shape.  Others just aren't adept at getting them ready to go at first asking.

 

Miscellaneous Factors:

Look with a skeptical eye at a horse that has done all his good racing at one track and is at a different track today:  If that track is on a better circuit (with better purses) the question becomes, "Why move to the lesser track if nothing is wrong?"  If the new track is on a classier circuit, the question becomes, "Can he handle the new tougher company?" 

 Which isn't to say shippers can't win and deserve to be favored - of course they can - but require "extra" evidence on these before considering them legit.

An older horse trying a higher class level for the first time should raise warning flags.  Unless lightly raced, why hasn't this runner tried tougher company previously?  Younger horses can blossom suddenly and climb rapidly up the class ladder, but older horses should have at least shown signs of being able to run competitively against the level of horses it's facing today.

Pace concerns are too complex to go into at any length here - but here are a couple of thoughts:
 
              - Consider for weak favorite status any horse that went  
                 wire-to-wire in its last against a slow early pace as a lone 
                 front runner - especially if it is likely to have pressure on 
                 the front today. 
 
              - Consider for weak favorite status any "deep closer" - those 
                 that like to dally through the first half of the race or longer, 
                 then try to mow them down in deep stretch.  They often fail.   
                 They are at the mercy of the pace developments in the early 
                 part of the race.  If a lone front runner scenario develops - 
                 and that lone f slows the pace down and has any ability at 
                 all, then the late runners' game is pretty much over.  Lots 
                 of places and shows for this type.

 

 

So - work with these ideas and any others you have about what makes a favorite vulnerable.  Try to come up with a way of quantifying your approach.  Turn it into a process - the results of which can be verified and then applied in a consistent way.  

If you do this, and then only wager in races where you have identified a potentially false favorite - you'll put yourself squarely and firmly onto the path to race betting success.

 

As an example, here are the results for the most recent 10 days of the HRG Index at the three highest purse value tracks we are currently issuing; Gulfstream, Santa Anita, and Fairgrounds: 

There were 86 bettable races (some were not bettable by the rules of the Index for reasons of either track weather conditions or small fields).  In 45 of these races, the top ranked Index horse was also favored - and of those 18 won for a 40% win rate.  

In the 41 other races (where the favorite was ranked 2nd or worse), the favorite won only 7 times for a 17.1% win rate!

Overall then, the favorite won 25 times in the 86 races for a win rate of 29.1%.  This is a little lower than average because we don't issue straight Maiden races, most Graded Stakes races, races with fewer than 6 starters, nor any race where the low morning line horses are legitimate and look like stand outs.

I hope you can see the extremely advantageous position you will put yourself in when you only wager in races where you consider the favorite weaker than other contenders in the race. 

(And no - the odds on those 40% winning favorites weren't such that a profit could have been made betting them to win).

The flat bet numbers on the top ranked horse in that series of false favorite races was delicious to say the least - as will be your betting results when you start to use this "secret" of race betting in a serious way.

The only other ingredient in the formula for reaching "pro" status in race wagering is:  how to bet those races you've decided are false favorite races in order to get the highest return?
More on that in future articles.

 

Any questions? - Please feel free to contact us:  support@HorseRacingGold.com

To subscribe to our handicapping service - go here

 

Until next time . . .